WiFi vs. Cellular = Home Automation vs. Property Automation

5 Jun

circle homes cellular

Power of Cellular

The world around us is getting “smarter.” And we are becoming increasingly more “connected” to this improved intelligence.

First smart phones, now smart homes. Soon, the internet of everything. It is amazing how quickly technology is racing ahead.

The smart home – i.e. home automation – is getting a lot of attention these days.

Here’s a quick list companies vying for a share of the home automation market (Side note: I complied this list for a January 2013 post, so it is by no means a complete list.)

That’s quite a list, right? It’s clear that home automation is getting a lot of investment interest and investment capital.

In fact, the smart home industry is expected to grow from $21B to 72B in the next 5 years! That’s a lot of dinero heading towards home automation.

However, even with all of the big names and big money headed towards home automation, there is a key component that is not being discussed.

WiFi vs. Celluar

This WiFi vs. Cellular topic is the core of the Home Automation vs. Property Automation discussion. Are you managing one home or an inventory of properties?

Here’s how PC Magazine defines cellular vs. WiFi:

In a nutshell, cellular is everywhere[.] Wi-Fi is only within a confined area approximately 50 to 100 feet in diameter.

Home automation offers huge potential for us all to achieve more control of our homes, and in essence, our lives – increased security, energy savings, ease of living, piece of mind. All controlled from mobile devices.

If home automation offers that much potential for an individual house – i.e. the home you live in – imagine the potential it offers on a commercial level where companies manage 10′s, 100′s, 1000′s of properties.

Increase security, energy management, operational efficiency across 1000′s of properties?! That is substantial.

Here’s the rub though, WiFi does not offer the reliability needed to connect 1-1000+ properties. Cellular does.

When the WiFi goes down at my house (a few times per week…grrrr!), I need to physically reboot the system (modem, router, etc.).

When the signal drops on your cell phone, do you even think about it? My guess is no. Cellular is self-managed (or at least not managed by you :) ). Signal drops and comes back without you worrying your pretty little head.

That’s a HUGE difference.

Imagine managing WiFi at 500 properties to make sure mission critical applications like access management, HVAC control, or motion detection are up and running.

In my humble opinion, there’s no way. WiFi based home automation systems make sense for one or two homes that you can directly manage. Beyond that, WiFi requires too much direct management.

When I worked for the vacation rental manager on the Outer Banks, 50% of our maintenance calls were because WiFi was down!

Cellular on the other hand, set it and forget it. Let the cellular network manage itself while you stay focused on running your business.

{Related Post: PointCentral is Uniquely Positioned to Provide Commercial Property Automation}

Below are a couple quick videos to offer a visual explanation of the difference. I’ll admit, they are a bit dry, but they do a great job of depicting a major difference in the networks…

  • The WiFi video demonstrates a network within a single home.
  • The cellular video focuses on a geographic network…not just one home, but many under one geographic network!

How a Cellular Telephone Works 

Intro. to WiFi

 Source: http://blog.pointcentral.com/2013/06/04/wifi-vs-cellular-home-automation-vs-property-automation/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: